Why Music Matters: Carole King Tapestry

Ah, I hear you say, but Carole King can’t sing for toffee! Does that matter? One of the most influential songwriters of the latter 20th century, creator of one of the most controversial (of its time) songs of the Sixties, yes, other people’s versions of her songs are probably better known, but I’m a lyricist fan first and foremost and a voice fan second. When the words are good and the sentiment is good, the singing style can only enhance that.

The song is Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow, which people don’t necessarily know was controversial but was all about sex before marriage. I’ve known women who, as a teenager, had to play it downstairs in their basement very quietly so their father didn’t hear it.

But that’s beside the point. I was wondering, in these Gaga-esque days, if there’s such a thing as a feminist album anymore. An album which explores all facets of being a woman and an artist, one that uses music to find out identity. On a superficial level, female artists the immediately spring to mind as dominating our music scene seem to court image as their identity and leave the msuic to come second. Depressing. But then I thought harder, about women I actually listen to. And then I remembered Kate Bush, Michelle Shocked, Laura Marling, Alela Diane, Agnes Obel, and felt cheered and warm again.

Carole King was old school feminism, paving the way for many of today’s modern artists and for many of today’s modern feminist thinking. She wasn’t of the bra burning (I know they didn’t actually burn their bras before you comment) league, but offered intelligent analysis of what it meant to be a woman and a human being. I found her the same way I found much of my feminism, at university, exploring the same issues for myself. If I’d heard Joni Mitchell first, Blue would probably be up here instead of Tapestry, but I didn’t. Joni M covers the same issues in a similar way and there are the same debates over her singing voice too.

Tapestry is feminine without being weak; it covers love, life, relationships and death (sometimes violent – the death I mean, not the relationships) with humour and intelligence. It’s more wide-ranging than just finding love. She talks about being rotten to the one you love and then she talks about wanting to alter or to compromise to please the one she loves. There’s a massacre in ‘Smackwater Jack’. She describes heaven or the afterlife in ‘Way over Yonder’ (at least, that’s how I always interpreted it) And she advocates liberal sexual attitudes on an album that simultaneously shows her on the cover, sitting, tapestry abandoned, on a window seat with her cat. It’s the album I listen to when doing housework and when I need a bit of validation. She’s a well rounded character and her songs reflect that.

 

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in General waffle, music, women, Writing and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Why Music Matters: Carole King Tapestry

  1. carol Apple says:

    I discovered the “Tapestry” album while I was in college (early ’80s), loved it, and listened over and over, but at the time I had no awareness of the feminist context . I just liked the songs. Maybe by that time it was something I took for granted. “Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow” was just something anyone would want to know…. Thinking of checking for it on iTunes so I can enjoy again.

  2. Hi, I’m over here from Bloggers’ Ball. Interesting post. As far as new-ish feminists in music? I’d say for sure, Alanis Morrisette. Pink too. Ever study their lyrics? Cheers! Catherine

    • basfordianthoughts says:

      Ooh, I never got past the dreadful “Ironic” with Alanis – perhaps it’s time for another go. Cheers!

  3. Tom Storer says:

    Very nice insights into “Tapestry,” although I’m surprised anyone would complain about Carole King’s singing, especially when one contemplates the faux-soul melisma horrors of the present day. And Joni? Debates over her singing voice? What?

    But anyway. In my 70’s adolescence, “Tapestry” was known by heart by everyone, whether one actually owned the album or not. I’m rediscovering the songs in a recent release by Irish singer Christine Tobin, accompanied only by pianist Liam Noble, called “Tapestry Unravelled.” They have a version of “So Far Away” on YouTube, well worth checking out. I hasten to note that I have no connection with either of them, I just feel they deserve a plug because the album is beautifully sung and played.

    • basfordianthoughts says:

      Thanks for stopping by. I’ve heard snippets of the Christine Tobin versions but need to spend time listening to those properly – I confess I’m a bit wary of covers of my favourite things so who can say if I’ll like this or not. I agree with you about the modern day faux-soul singing but then I’m happy listening to both King and Mitchell – however, I’ve had many an alcohol fuelled argument with those who aren’t. Miserable sods!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s